Access our support and expertise:
We work with the Accelerated Access Collaborative (AAC) to deliver the MedTech Funding Mandate policy. The policy aims to accelerate equitable patient access to NICE recommended devices, diagnostics or digital products that deliver savings to the NHS; are cost saving in year; and affordable to the NHS.
Each year a small number of innovative medical devices, diagnostics, and digital products are selected for coordinated spread across all 15 HINs.
The MedTech Funding Mandate (MTFM) is an NHS Long Term Plan commitment to getting selected NICE-approved cost-saving devices, diagnostics and digital products to NHS patients more quickly.
The MTFM policy strives to ensure healthcare providers enable equitable access to selected, proven products, with funding provided from commissioners’ existing allocations. The policy implementation is supported across England’s ICSs by the Health Innovation Network.
The aim of the policy is to accelerate equitable patient access to medical technologies that are clinically effective, provide cost saving in three years (as determined by NICE) and are affordable to the NHS (costs not exceeding £20 million), by supporting their implementation and scaling (adoption and spread).
To achieve the aim, the objectives of the MTFM policy are to:
From April 2025, HINs are supporting the implementation of Aposhealth. The policy can be found here.
AposHealth (NICE Guidance MTG76.) is a non-invasive device worn on the feet to reduce pain and improve function in patients with knee osteoarthritis. The device consists of a pair of AposHealth shoes with 2 curved pods (pertupods) on the heel and forefoot of each shoe.
AposHealth has been recommended as a cost-saving option to manage knee osteoarthritis in adults when the follow criteria apply:
Technologies - Why were these technologies selected for inclusion in the MTFM policy?
NICE Diagnostic and Medical Technology guidance were reviewed for technologies that meet the following three criteria:
Effective - Based on positive NICE guidance that evidences; clinical effectiveness, improved patient recovery & are time releasing
Cost saving within 3 years - NICE modelling demonstrates a net saving in the first 3 years of implementing the technology
Affordable to the NHS - The budget impact should not exceed £20 million, in any of the first three years
Technologies that have reached a good level of widescale adoption and spread and therefore have graduated from HIN support include:
Four technologies that are alternative treatments to transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) for benign prostatic hyperplasia:
Three technologies that are an alternative to more invasive procedures:
These technologies, while not within the commission for support by HINs are still supported by the MedTech Funding Mandate policy, whereby, they are still excluded from the associated core payment mechanisms or prices within the NHS Payment Scheme 23-25, they are instead chargeable as passthrough items.
Q: Funding - Is additional funding provided to purchase the technologies?
A: The MTFM policy does not provide additional funding for the technologies it supports. Instead, commissioners are responsible for funding MTFM technologies that providers want to use. MTFM funding should form part of a regular contract and commissioning discussions between Finance, Commissioning teams and Clinicians. The MTFM policy criteria ensure that technologies are cost-saving within three years.
Technologies will be added to the mandate on a yearly basis, signalled in the summer, confirmed in Autumn and then available to purchase in the following April.
Q: Mandation - What is mandated by the policy?A: This policy mandates commissioners to fund these technologies as prescribed by the NHS National Tariff Payment System and in line with local clinician needs and demands.
If a provider wants to utilise a technology then the local commissioner is mandated to fund it. Providers and commissioners should submit a variation to NHS England, using the required template, if they are not following this guidance
Q: Compliance - What is meant by policy compliance?
A: To comply with the Policy, if a provider wants to adopt eligible technologies then their local commissioner will fund the costs of implementing the technologies. If the commissioner does not agree to fund these costs then they will be non-compliant with the Policy.
If a provider/clinical team/clinician does not want to adopt one or more of the technologies then they create inequities in patient access to the technologies compared to NHS patients receiving care in other parts of England.
The Health Innovation Network’s Quarterly Assurance Reporting process for its commissioners in the NHS England and NHS Improvement Innovation, Research and Life Sciences team will be used as the gold standard for monitoring uptake of the technologies on the policy and will be one of the catalysts for escalation of compliance and adoption.
Contractual Requirements
The NHS Standard Contract requires both commissioners and providers of NHS-funded services to comply, where relevant.*
This builds on existing contractual requirement(s) to have regard for guidance published by NICE.
*where technology is not relevant to the organisation (e.g. services not provided) or if another/alternative treatment is better suited to a patient (based on clinical decision making)
Q: Procurement - How should the technologies on the MTFM policy be procured?
A: Technologies will be available for procurement through the relevant NHS Supply Chain Category Tower framework.
Some products on these schemes are supported by dedicated funding, which providers and commissioners can apply for, to integrate use into everyday practices and help to overcome deployment barriers.
If you have any questions related to the MedTech products or how the EMAHSN are supporting this policy, please contact This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it..
For other enquires please contact This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it..
Health Innovation East Midlands became the MTFM technology lead for XprESS in April 2022. The core aspect of this role was to provide resources for all the Health Innovation MTFM Leads to support the adoption and spread of XprESS.
While the Health Innovation Network support for XprESS has come to an end, the resources are made available on this webpage for those interested in the adoption of XprESS.
The XprESS toolkit, it provides detailed information on XprESS, the ENT patient pathway and implementation considerations.
The XprESS – revised NICE impact tool: based on 19/20 data, this tool can be used to input known patient cohort numbers to understand the potential cost-effectiveness of adoption XprESS.
An XprESS – business case: an example of a successful business case that can be used as a template.
SecurAcath at Kettering General Hospital - MedTech funding mandate product. Positive adoption in practice example:
Kettering General Hospital (KGH) completed the change to SecurAcath usage in September 2021 for oncology, haematology and diabetic foot patients whose lines are placed by the nurse-led Haematology and Oncology PICC Insertion Team. After successful trials, the initiative to move to SecurAcath came from the MedTech Funding Mandate. KGH place approximately 265 peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC) lines every year by the nurse-led team and the process entailed switching successfully from the old adhesive devices to SecurAcath devices. Through using SecurAcath the department has seen fewer issues with patients returning with PICC line concerns re: pistoning and migration (movement at the insertion site) and therefore fewer replacement lines being required, less disruption to patients treatment schedules and less resource use. The Training was exceptional and thorough and there were no implementation issues. These devices support the cleaning of the line and dressing changes with the system being more secure for the procedure. Patients are more confident with having their line in situ and continuation of the ‘life’ away from treatment attendances. Cost savings at KGH relating to the switch from the old adhesive devices to SecurAcath is approximately £15,000 per annum. This is due to the use of 1 device being used over a period of 16 weeks compared to the old device being changed at least 18 times in that period. The higher cost of the SecurAcath device is more than offset by the saving achieved against the previous volume of the adhesive devices used. Emma Mills, Divisional Head of Nursing Pathology, Haematology, Oncology, Outpatients (FHD) and Research & Macmillan Nurse Lead SACT and Acute Oncology, Kettering General Hospital NHS Foundation Trust
Kettering General Hospital (KGH) completed the change to SecurAcath usage in September 2021 for oncology, haematology and diabetic foot patients whose lines are placed by the nurse-led Haematology and Oncology PICC Insertion Team. After successful trials, the initiative to move to SecurAcath came from the MedTech Funding Mandate. KGH place approximately 265 peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC) lines every year by the nurse-led team and the process entailed switching successfully from the old adhesive devices to SecurAcath devices.
Through using SecurAcath the department has seen fewer issues with patients returning with PICC line concerns re: pistoning and migration (movement at the insertion site) and therefore fewer replacement lines being required, less disruption to patients treatment schedules and less resource use. The Training was exceptional and thorough and there were no implementation issues. These devices support the cleaning of the line and dressing changes with the system being more secure for the procedure. Patients are more confident with having their line in situ and continuation of the ‘life’ away from treatment attendances.
Cost savings at KGH relating to the switch from the old adhesive devices to SecurAcath is approximately £15,000 per annum. This is due to the use of 1 device being used over a period of 16 weeks compared to the old device being changed at least 18 times in that period. The higher cost of the SecurAcath device is more than offset by the saving achieved against the previous volume of the adhesive devices used.
Emma Mills, Divisional Head of Nursing Pathology, Haematology, Oncology, Outpatients (FHD) and Research & Macmillan Nurse Lead SACT and Acute Oncology, Kettering General Hospital NHS Foundation Trust
Patient experience blog - take a look at our blog written by a patient who shares her experience of using the MedTech product gammaCore